But we're not buying anything, we're licensing it. The core issue might actually be a simple matter of semantics: when we click a digital button that is labelled "Buy," we expect that we're actually buying something. This fine print will always have a clause that says you are a mere tenant farmer of your books, and not their owner, and your right to carry around your "purchases" (which are really conditional licenses, despite misleading buttons labeled with words like "Buy this with one click" - I suppose "Conditionally license this with one click" is deemed too cumbersome for a button) can be revoked without notice or explanation (or, notably, refund) at any time. Instead, we rent them, or hold them in a sort of long-term lease, the terms of which are brokered and policed exclusively by the leaseholder.Īs Boing Boing's Cory Doctorow put it in a blog post yesterday: But it serves as a bitter reminder that we don't ever truly own the digital goods and software we buy online. Nygaard's little dust-up with Amazon isn't, in and of itself, a big deal. What other account? Murphy wouldn't share that, either.Īnd it probably won't be. A man named Michael Murphy with Amazon UK's "Executive Customer Relations" told Nygaard her account had been determined to be "directly related to another which has been previously closed for abuse of our policies." Which policies? He wouldn't say. That's when things took a Kafkaesque turn ( as documented by her friend, Martin Bekkelund, on his blog). Those friendly phone-based customer support folks couldn't access Nygaard's account either, and she was passed on to "account specialists" who only communicated via email. Nygaard was pleased with Amazon's prompt service, she told us, even though this was her second Kindle to fall victim to "stripes" on the ePaper screen.īut when Nygaard attempted to log into her Amazon account the next day, her account was suspended - and with it access to her library of 43 books. (I live in Norway, but have a friend who lives in London.)" They could only ship the replacement to UK because it was originally purchased there, and I told them I would find an address the next day. "Someone immediately found the Kindle in the system and told me they would replace it free of charge. In other words, even one of the fastest microSD cards is twice as slow as the Fire tablet's internal storage."Two weeks ago my Kindle started showing stripes on the screen and I contacted Amazon support," Nygaard told NBC News. We tested this 16GB SanDisk A2 microSD card (A2 cards are supposed to be the best for apps) with a 7th-generation Fire HD 8, and random read speeds were 3x slower than the internal storage, with even worse random write speeds. As we covered in detail, even the fastest microSD cards are slower than the internal storage used by modern phones and tablets. However, moving apps to your SD card makes your Fire tablet slower. That means you can use an SD card as an extension to your internal storage. Older Fire tablets let you move some apps to the microSD card, but if you have a model released in the last few years, it's probably running on Android 7.0 Nougat or newer. No matter how you cut it, you don't have a lot of room to work with, especially if you download movies and music for offline listening. The Amazon Fire HD 8 and 10 ship with 32GB of storage in their base configurations, while the Fire 7 includes a paltry 16GB.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |